on
RE:
Makes sense that you would keep the associated document history.
RE:
One way of controlling your cash flow and also helping small customers get their payments done, is to use SEPA Direct Debit collections. So in my company we offer a payment discount to encourage customers to use this option and sign the mandate agreement.When creating the DD collection, the system completely ignores the payment terms set of the SEPA DD. I can see the payment discount on the customer ledger entry, but when reading the code, it only considers "Remaining amount", again completely ignoring "payment discount possible" within the payment discount date and payment tolerance date if that is set up.To me this is not new functionality, this is a bug in finding the right amount to withdraw from customer bank account. I am finding it very difficult to explain why it should work like that, when it works differently in all other instances. As long as the direct debit is made within the payment discount date, the amount should be reduced accordingly, Pls fix!
RE:
would be great to have such function. Only cumberstone can be the website, which can lock you after to many promts a day.
RE:
This is critical for some customers. Is there any news if Microsoft will consider this ?
RE:
Per my MS Support ticket: Microsoft have the existing GetAuditStorageDetails API. https://url.au.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/HPbcCQnMQAsX8ENOIxfAcGQV8W?domain=learn.microsoft.comThis provides granular information that would be extremely helpful to see within the Power Platform Admin Centre.This will help to address which tables are generating substantial audit records, in order to then have the information to act accordingly. Using this concept, I'd like to see a similar GetActivityStorageDetails API. So that we can see more granularly, which tables are contributing most substantially to Activity storage consumption.
RE:
This functionality was widely used by our teams to register return of goods at zero value. We would greatly appreciate restoring this function.
RE:
Please bring back this feature. Or provide a workaround to select multiple from a drop down list.
RE:
Agreed. This was a key part of User Groups that was jettisoned in the switchover to Security Groups. I think it was an oversight by the dev team.
RE:
Business Central seems to have a feature that would be good to have in D365 Finance. Allow substitute customer or vendor posting groups on documentsYou can let people choose other customer and vendor posting groups than the default groups when they're working with sales or purchase documents and journals.To allow changes to customer posting groups, choose Allow Multiple Posting Groups on the Sales & Receivable Setup and Service Mgt. Setup pages, and the Purchase & Payables Setup page for vendor posting group changes.On the Customer Posting Groups or Vendor Posting Groups pages, you can specify the posting groups to allow as substitutes by choosing Substitutions. Substitute posting groups can replace the default customer or vendor posting groups specified for a customer or vendor.After you set this up, you can choose from the allowed substitute posting groups and change the customer or vendor posting group when posting sales or purchase documents and journals. The substitute customer or vendor posting groups are copied to posted documents and journals, and payable or receivable G/L entries are posted to the G/L accounts specified for the substitutes.When applying, for example, an invoice and payment that are posted with different customer or vendor posting groups (different G/L accounts), Business Central transfers the amounts between the G/L accounts to balance them.
RE:
Should REALLLY be implemented a.s.a.p.