on
RE:
As a partner, we frequently receive requests from customers to either enable or disable filter memory on reports, especially for date filters or custom toggles. Currently, the only way to change the SaveValues behavior is by modifying the base report, which:Breaks compatibility with standard reports.Increases maintenance cost Forces us to duplicate entire reports just to change one property.If SaveValues were extendable via reportextension, we could cleanly customize filter persistence behavior in a supported and non-invasive way — consistent with the extensibility model.Please consider prioritizing this — it would eliminate a very common pain point for partners and improve report maintainability across projects.We support this idea and would implement it across dozens of reports immediately if allowed.
RE:
All our customers using the production module request this functionality.
RE:
Are the label data sources associated to actively used labels? I have the ability to remove a table join that is added on the label data sources I have created. Do you have an example? I would love to confirm this before voting it up.
RE:
I don't know many whom use this Work audit template lines update setup in d365. But it makes sense that it only works on the put since the work is not created in the system on inbound receiving until the PO is initiated on device and registered, then it creates the put work. What is the use case out of curiosity?
RE:
Have you looked into utilizing Slotting replenishment ? This may get you close to what you are trying to do in interim.
RE:
Have you looked into utilizing the Mobile WMS app with Packing station and utilizing mobile detours and data inquiries? this would allow you to see a list, choose shipment pack container etc. there are a few ISVs that have enhanced the packing station to function similar to your ask.Although it is a good idea to update the native behavior. I voted :)
RE:
How has this not gotten more traction... It seems like such an obvious need. Multi-select choices have existed for almost a decade and yet still have limited support throughout other features like Business Rules and PowerFX Formula fields.
RE:
To be able to apply a Profile/Role to a Group and put Users in a Group is easier to manage than to apply a Profile/Role to each individual user. It's the same principle used in File Server directory access and would seem to work just as well for Business Central.
RE:
I totally agree with this idea, much needed!!
RE:
This is a legal requirement for most companies. Unsure why this is not yet implemented. There are many ideas submitted here with the same requirements.