on
RE:
Solution:To resolve this issue, you need to enable the feature: “Propagate the 'Allow depreciation when placed in service and disposal are in the same fiscal year' from Fixed Asset parameters to all newly created asset books.” Once this feature is enabled, the system functions as expected.
RE:
This is a no brainer. This table tends to end up in top 20 largest tables with no periodic task available to clean up
RE:
in general the GUID should be visible as Name rather than GUID. Where needed from a privacy pov, this could be a GDPR setting in some way. GUIDs don't tell and need additional hover, lookup actions
RE:
Also the link to the correct legal entity would be highly appreciated
RE:
As a consultant involved in areas including migrations, it is often the case that we build up many companies (as backups) in Sandbox environments. It is a time-consuming task to delete companies individually. It is possible to select multiple companies at once and delete, but the problem here is that once the first company is deleted, the prompt appears to confirm deletion of the next company - the process is halted until user interaction.The deletion of multiple companies should simply be a bypass of subsequent checks.
RE:
When you are working with maybe 10.000 planning lines you will have to set some filters like, vendor, Purchase code, date filter etc.You would want to be able to save filters
RE:
+ 1
RE:
As a partner, we frequently receive requests from customers to either enable or disable filter memory on reports, especially for date filters or custom toggles. Currently, the only way to change the SaveValues behavior is by modifying the base report, which:Breaks compatibility with standard reports.Increases maintenance cost Forces us to duplicate entire reports just to change one property.If SaveValues were extendable via reportextension, we could cleanly customize filter persistence behavior in a supported and non-invasive way — consistent with the extensibility model.Please consider prioritizing this — it would eliminate a very common pain point for partners and improve report maintainability across projects.We support this idea and would implement it across dozens of reports immediately if allowed.
RE:
All our customers using the production module request this functionality.
RE:
Are the label data sources associated to actively used labels? I have the ability to remove a table join that is added on the label data sources I have created. Do you have an example? I would love to confirm this before voting it up.