Skip to main content

Vote (0) Share
's profile image

on

Comments (0)
's profile image Profile Picture

Eric Thunem on 27 Feb 2025 17:02:28

RE:

I am surprised there is not more of a demand for this feature. With Omnichannel retail becoming more important, and in the interest of maintaining clean data, the POS should help the user avoid creating a duplicate customer account. This should be part of the standard application, like it is in the back office.

's profile image Profile Picture

Roland Vueghs on 27 Feb 2025 15:56:26

RE:

HI Luca,I see that this behaviour disappeared in the Belgian localization. Kr,Roland

's profile image Profile Picture

Jürgen Weber on 27 Feb 2025 15:25:46

RE:

In that context perhaps Microsoft could also look into a general approval of the sequencing by being able to setup a kind of advanced sequencing matrix that would enable the user to setup different setup and consider different setup times if one order is sequenced after an other order and in this constellation it required less or even none setup time compared to the case when an other item would be next in the sequence!

's profile image Profile Picture

Jake Milford on 27 Feb 2025 12:52:38

RE:

This is very sorely missing. It was there in AX 2012. It's somewhat possible now with Edit in Grid. Yes, I know we could use DMF (Import/Export), but COME ON! Super helpful when you only need to update select records. I would even take a separate way if we could do this via OData and CRUD. ;)Example that I have done in the past is to update Packing quantity in the WHSSalesLine table. Have the InventTransId necessary and filter by that.

's profile image Profile Picture

YALING WENG on 27 Feb 2025 12:15:26

RE:

Sorry, I have made a mistake with the typo, the idea title should be "Should Disable the ability to change PO value without unreceipting

's profile image Profile Picture

Martin Petersen on 27 Feb 2025 11:43:55

RE:

Yes, please, we definitely need translations of item charges!Today I have to create the same item charge for each language!

's profile image Profile Picture

Waqas Latif Siddiqui on 27 Feb 2025 11:39:18

RE:

For example 100,000 shows formatted as expected but once used into template it shows 100000.The comma and fractions gets removed i.e 100,000.25 will be showing as 100000

's profile image Profile Picture

Tony Rogerson on 27 Feb 2025 11:15:52

RE:

Surely the underlying database (SQL Server) isn't the cause here because the maximum unless you are using smalldatetime is 9999-12-31. I understand there will be remediation for existing customers that rely on it being 2154 so perhaps you could make this configurable so those customers not wanting to be locked into the artificial limit of 2154 can freely use up to 9999-12-31 as the underlying database technology supports?

's profile image Profile Picture

Ellen Lawrence on 27 Feb 2025 08:32:20

RE:

We would like it to be increased to 60 days

's profile image Profile Picture

Lyn Smith on 27 Feb 2025 02:11:04

RE:

We have customers who receive donations and they need to print receipts for their donors. These donors can then use the receipts as claims in their tax returns.