on
RE:
This is a critical feature for many organizations especially if emails are being sent out with the link in the email. Or links are made from the top site and one wants to maintain trust with the customer. There are a lot of scams going on so using a certified domain is one way to mitigate this.
RE:
Katrina has raised this - Ability to Revalue the GL using Different FX rates - https://experience.dynamics.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=db7964f7-39a8-ef11-95f5-0022485288a6Please vote for this.
RE:
It would be a great feature and better design to have an option (checkbox) on the fields in the model driven apps form editor to display descriptions so it can be targeted, and not all or nothing.
RE:
I know this suggestion is 2.5+ years old but YES.We have many customers with multiple ship-to addresses and some of those customers want to see order confirmations, invoices, and credit memos sent to different recipients based on the ship-to address.At present, there is only one option, set at the customer level, for Document Layouts. For us, at least, it would be better if the entire Document Layouts page was tied to the Ship-to card vs. the Customer card.
RE:
Desperately needed.
RE:
This change could be a great benefit for information clarity.
RE:
Hi Kitty GeigerThank you for your response. However, I believe there may have been a misunderstanding regarding the requirement.I am looking to change the start date of the deferral, not the billing end date.Please review the scenario carefully:The billing schedule start date is 13th January 2024.I have enabled Rule-15 from the deferral parameters.Based on this rule, the deferral start date should be 1st January 2024, not 13th January 2024.When I attempt to manually set the deferral start date to 1st January 2024 on the billing schedule deferral form, I receive the following error:“Deferral start date should be greater than or equal to billing start date.”Please advise on how to handle this situation so that the deferral can start on 1st January 2024 as per the rule.
RE:
Honestly. I think it would be better to just modernize and speed up the search. Please just do your own UX experience. try with 100 or more templates to find what you need. you'll see what needs to be updated. All these feature requests come down to just updating the search and insert of templates for speed and ease of use when there are many with various naming conventions.... thanks for trying it out to see if you agree MS.
RE:
Agree. Standard fields like external document number, posting date, document date, due date, etc. should be available on all sales and purchase reports.
RE:
YES PLEASE! External Document Number (vendor's invoice/credit number) should be available on any report related to vendor transactions like Vendor Pre-Payment report noted, Purchase Invoice-Test, Purchase Invoice (same fore credit memos), etc. Reports should also have document date, due date and posting date all available like on the Aged Accounts Payable report, not just 1 or the other based on aging date selected. Standard fields should all be available on the reports. Shouldn't need development for the standard fields to be available on the reports. Users request these type of fields all the time.