Skip to main content

Vote (0) Share
's profile image

on

Comments (0)
's profile image Profile Picture

Rasa Pliopliene on 06 Jan 2025 12:14:38

RE:

In NAV and older versions we used to have filter option | to add additional values from the list, but in BC it is not possible to do so. Let's say we have three vendors in the list - V0001, V0002 and V0003. And in the report in older versions we were using filters V0001|V0003. In BC however, if I select V0001| and trying to add V0003 - it overwrites previous value and leaves just V0003.Would be nice to have that filter option back!

's profile image Profile Picture

Marius Leo Münier on 06 Jan 2025 09:26:05

RE:

Much needed feature. Please develop a solution.

's profile image Profile Picture

Vipul Gupta on 06 Jan 2025 07:53:29

RE:

This is something that is absolutely required. Adding this property makes the API so much more useful.

's profile image Profile Picture

Rishi Awasthi on 06 Jan 2025 03:48:13

RE:

do we have any tentative timeline?

's profile image Profile Picture

Karthik Shriramneni on 05 Jan 2025 13:21:25

RE:

Yes, Unavailability of financial dimension is clear hard stop if any mandatory financial dimensions are involved or if the client is using the "Balancing financial dimension" concept. It not advisable to default the dimension from the vendor or customer master. MS must provide the provision to define the dimension at the netting page or it should auto pick the dimensions from the original transaction.

's profile image Profile Picture

Shankar Radha on 05 Jan 2025 11:20:12

RE:

We have client currently uses a system accomodate less than 200 characters for item number, - now transition to Business Central make it harder to have the same item, and they are in the configure-to-order business (smart light), where each product can be configured to a specific compatible component, which can create zillions of sellable items in this competitive market.

's profile image Profile Picture

Ben Laughlin on 05 Jan 2025 02:31:37

RE:

An additional comment on our situation. The issue that appears when two solutions are trying to delete more than one object, but the order of the solution layers on each object are different so neither solution can be deleted as the other has dependencies preventing it.

's profile image Profile Picture

Ben Laughlin on 05 Jan 2025 02:26:49

RE:

We have this problem. A solution would be very helpful.

's profile image Profile Picture

Econographics of Knoxville, Inc. on 04 Jan 2025 16:26:50

RE:

Great idea. Needs to event driven as well. On Focus, Click, etc. Power BI won't be really complete until that happens. Power Automate is not sufficient and buggy (my opinion). Flows run fine and then fail, usually failing to fine previously defined elements - my experience anyway.

's profile image Profile Picture

Martin Grunau on 04 Jan 2025 16:26:19

RE:

This is terribly frustrating. PowerBI is such a great tool, but User Interfacing to build reports is not competitive. The "Advanced Editor" is the least powerful text editor I think I have ever seen. Simplest things such as search / replace functions do not exist. Contextual help is unintelligent, etc.... Some of these requests exists since 2018 (7 years). Please provide improvements to build, debug and maintain Reports in the advanced editor. Much appreciated