on
RE:
I would like to see Root Cause analysis & Risk Analysis as their own tables that can be used with Non conformity as well.
RE:
Yes, let's do this. I have a workspace that cannot be deleted because it is part of a pipeline and shouldn't have to use the API to clean this up.
RE:
I cannot believe that this has not been implemented yet. What a basic requirement. How many years has this issue been open? Competitor tools have allowed this what seems like forever. Do they even look at how a competitor might do something better?
RE:
This seems like a great idea - the ability to keep the map pins in sync with the requirements at the bottom of the schedule board. This intuitively is how most people think about the map pins and often get confused when there are pins on the map that are not shown in the requirements view below, and vice versa. The map should dynamically display the pins for whatever requirements are shown at the bottom of the schedule board. Thanks, Jacob
RE:
still not available in 2024, getting quite ridiculous
RE:
">"
RE:
This is a very frustrating experience for our users in Manhattan especially where we get 5-10 work orders in a single building, there is no easy way to schedule them without writing down the work order numbers and then searching for the requirement in the list below.
RE:
I'm a new user coming from Tableau. While is has issues like this as well, it is a very simple function over there. We use this frequently to expand and collapse columns such as address fields, sales hierarchies, etc to save real-estate on the page. Any updates when this is coming?
RE:
Isn't this just a matter of renaming the file to .PBIX inflight as part of the deployment?
RE:
Example:Acme Co. ----------- 34%Widget Inc. --------------------- 50%Things Corp. ------ 25%IDEA: If I pick Widget Inc. it now looks like this and highlights the selection but hides the other names of things.................. ----------- 34%Widget Inc. --------------------- 50%.................. ------ 25%So then you still have your frame of reference yet blind the competing choices.A filter just does this and looks uninformativeWidget Inc. --------------------- 50%And highlight showsAcme Co. ----------- 34%Widget Inc. --------------------- 50%Things Corp. ------ 25%