Skip to main content

Vote (0) Share
's profile image

on

Comments (0)
's profile image Profile Picture

Ngaire McGaw on 25 Mar 2025 01:15:49

RE:

Agreed. This would make up for missing data and is a common feature of competing carbon platforms. [Missing quarterly utility bills are a particular problem when the billing period straddles the end of a reporting period (eg end of financial year).] Note that other platforms use the whole consumption/billing period (on a utility invoice) - not invoice date - to automatically assign consumption to each month/day. However, in MSM, the filtering for time periods (eg cutting off at 30 June) doesn't appear to work this way and could generate inaccurate reports.

's profile image Profile Picture

Ngaire McGaw on 25 Mar 2025 00:45:40

RE:

Agreed. Health care providers will want to add their own scope 3 categories such as 'Delivery of Care', Commissioned Services', 'Patient and Visitor travel'. Refer Tennison, Roschnik, et al. (Feb 2021), 'Health care's response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England', The Lancet Planetary Health, UK.

's profile image Profile Picture

Ngaire McGaw on 25 Mar 2025 00:28:19

RE:

Agreed. The units of measure should reflect NGER/EERs requirements. The totals for consumption required are by organisational structure. Note that emissions calculations are not required for this. Note that this original suggestion was 2 years ago.

's profile image Profile Picture

Michael Daniel on 24 Mar 2025 22:49:35

RE:

Hi, I see this request was raised back in 2021 and has still not been actioned. Australian law specifies that Government records must be retained for set periods, per the Archives Act 1983. To prevent unauthorised record destruction, agents must NOT be able to delete records. Microsoft need to understand. By not allowing us to modify Omnichannel roles (which include the Delete privilege on Conversations) this product is not fit for purpose in any Government organisation. A 4-year plus vote for what should have been a compulsory feature on day one, is laughable. I am very disappointed.

's profile image Profile Picture

Josh Torrisi on 24 Mar 2025 22:15:48

RE:

Great idea!

's profile image Profile Picture

Josh Torrisi on 24 Mar 2025 22:15:44

RE:

Great idea!

's profile image Profile Picture

Farazeh Mian on 24 Mar 2025 20:20:33

RE:

This is an important feature for our customer - they use it to view the parent-child account hierarchy which is a part of their day-to-day processes.

's profile image Profile Picture

Cameron Embree on 24 Mar 2025 18:19:00

RE:

Our business cannot use GiveX as a stored value solution without the ability to issue a virtual GiveX gift card. Support exists for this functionality for SVS but not for GiveX:https://experience.dynamics.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=ddfe3fc7-73f4-ed11-913a-0003ff45b7ac

's profile image Profile Picture

Robert Gaisbauer on 24 Mar 2025 14:39:21

RE:

shading preferred

's profile image Profile Picture

Tom Blaisdell on 24 Mar 2025 12:42:43

RE:

As an alternative, use an Item of Type Service or Non-Inventory, which works well for such scenarios.