on
RE:
Good suggestion
RE:
great idea, not sure how this was missed!
RE:
Hi,Unfortunately the function seems to be recently redrawn by Microsoft.Is there any chance that a new or similar function will come again?Kind regards,Steven
RE:
This is an absolute must for expense account intensive businesses. An expense account review/compliance Agent would be a great feature setting us apart from the competition. Flagging suspicious entries such as doublets before submitting would be right up the Agent's alley. This would increase efficiency for sure.
RE:
I genuinely hope this gets implemented soon, as it's something we've been needing for quite some time. From both an inventory controller and finance controller perspective, this would significantly improve our workflow and accuracy. Really appreciate your efforts—thank you!
RE:
And when we update our Business Central say we have 14 customs projects to publish after update that are all on version 1.0.0.0 sometimes the update unpublish all our extensions then we cant publish the same 1.0.0.0 version its saying you already installed before this version ( and its not even published or installed right now ! ) So you have to increase version in 14 different projects build them again and publish ! Thats Crazy..
RE:
This isn’t just an idea — it’s something Microsoft should have implemented already!!!
RE:
Inline images listed as attachments is very confusing in the crm timeline, @microsoft, can you address this? Thanks
RE:
Good idea!
RE:
Fully agree — inventory aging should not reset when items are moved between warehouses. Using the original receipt date from the PO ensures accurate aging and better stock management.