on
RE:
I can't believe this is still an issue after seeing threads 4+ years old complaining about this problem. I can't even imagine a scenario where a company would NOT want their BOMs to reflect current descriptions.? At the very least MS should add an option for automatic updating of these descriptions. Just as a user can "CALC STANDARD COST" a user should be able to "UPDATE ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTIONS". Just because people aren't upvoting the issue doesn't mean it should be ignored. It's a flaw in Business Central and should be repaired immediately.
RE:
For Real Time Journey's I can't figure out how to mimic what I was doing in Outbound Marketing.
RE:
Great idea!
RE:
Agree with Luc de Wit. This would result in cleaner solutions and faster implementations versus iterating through the list and comparing values.
RE:
It would be great to see that configured product variants get engineering product attributes inherited from the configuration attributes. That would help in search plus in the documentation of the variant throughout the supply chain.
RE:
This feature has of January 2025 been enabled in third party CRMs (e.g. Salesforce or ServiceNow) when utilizing D365 Contact Center. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot-service/copilot-ask-a-questionIt's highly motivated and needed to add this feature to Dynamics too.
RE:
This has been addressed now (April 2025) by introducing the same status settings as in MS Teams. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-enhanced-agent-presence-management-roman-nikiforov-oyg2e/?trackingId=hketTCcrT1eIBg5LwhW4jA%3D%3D
RE:
I also agree, creating a hybrid scenario for direct delivery should not be the solution.
RE:
If there is not comming a solution for this, then the second best solution is to make some UI that makes it visible for the user which fields on the overview that is not included in the search result.
RE:
Great idea!