on
RE:
You should consider looking at binary Streams ASM module. It has expanded features for BOM
RE:
The basic situation is this:Goods arrive from POs/TOs to fulfill open demand for a TO/SOInstead of a new LP for each item, the cross-docking work is consolidated to an existing pallet LP. In the TO example, it greatly simplifies receiving at the destination because the worker only needs to scan the single pallet LP, not an LP for every different that was cross docked. One enhancement that I would add to the existing idea, if it were taken up, would be to also enable the Confirm and Transfer Feature to support for LP Consolidation. My suggestion would close the loop on instances where you successfully cross docked to an existing pallet in staging, but for any number of reasons you are unable load the pallet onto the truck. Confirm and transfer should spin the In process work off to a new load; however, this is not supported today.
RE:
There are 2 settings currently (version 43). one toggle on billing schedule parameters to align deferral dates to billing: iI you turn this off then on the ARED parameters you can choose a different document start date : Rule 15 is currently an option. System defaults to Document date but you can choose Rule 15, First of current Month or first of next Month.
RE:
Ability to place holds and terminate in Bulk via Periodic Tasks and Data entities needs to be available for BOTH Billing Schedules and Deferral Schedules.
RE:
Definitely need the ability to rolldown address changes to active billing schedule header and lines. Or give the option to rolldown or keep as is. Many clients pay for a customization to do this.
RE:
This is a critical feature needed in many integration scenarios. Please vote up! I'll bring the beers when implemented.
RE:
We need this as well. It is very common for large dollar purchases to have multiple milestone payments. Typically, our vendors do a structure similar to this:Down payment - 30%2nd Milestone - 30%3rd Milestone - 30%Final payment on delivery - 10%What we currently do is receive the 30% (this is false, we don't have anything physical on hand) so we can process the invoice. Then for the 2nd milestone, we will increase the received % to cover the next invoice, etc.It is NOT feasible to do a prepayment of 100% then expect our accounting manager to know when the next invoice is due as she does not process invoices.
RE:
There is key data missing from a full review and implementation now in production such as:-RT form data doesn't show form name, owner, owning business unit (or name) -Web traffic data is not available there - it is not clear these tables our outbound-Clarity in documentation or on the table what is outbound, CIJ (RT) or both
RE:
We use this screen on a daily basis and it would be very beneficial to have the vendor name added to the screen We have to hover over each vendor number to see the actual name of the vendor to know what vendor we are seeing.
RE:
We have sales orders that move dates and it is very time consuming for the warehouse team to unreserve all product and redo their work once completed to enable the date to be changed on the order. This would help with reducing the workload for the warehouse team