on
RE:
This is also needed in raw material picking. It is a major issue that this is missing.
RE:
We really need this functionnality ! It is not possible that the reject count does not have any consequences !
RE:
This is really an issue when moving environments to another tenant. When you move a Business Central environment to a new tenant, the user records from the old tenant persist in the environment. These users don't have a BC license and cannot be deleted through the UI because they are no longer linked to Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD). This creates clutter and confusion, especially in environments with many users.
RE:
Kindly assist to expedite the implementation process as this is essential to avoid future duplication of submission.Thank you!
RE:
Generation of record 0221 for other states
RE:
Solution:To resolve this issue, you need to enable the feature: “Propagate the 'Allow depreciation when placed in service and disposal are in the same fiscal year' from Fixed Asset parameters to all newly created asset books.” Once this feature is enabled, the system functions as expected.
RE:
This is a no brainer. This table tends to end up in top 20 largest tables with no periodic task available to clean up
RE:
in general the GUID should be visible as Name rather than GUID. Where needed from a privacy pov, this could be a GDPR setting in some way. GUIDs don't tell and need additional hover, lookup actions
RE:
Also the link to the correct legal entity would be highly appreciated
RE:
As a consultant involved in areas including migrations, it is often the case that we build up many companies (as backups) in Sandbox environments. It is a time-consuming task to delete companies individually. It is possible to select multiple companies at once and delete, but the problem here is that once the first company is deleted, the prompt appears to confirm deletion of the next company - the process is halted until user interaction.The deletion of multiple companies should simply be a bypass of subsequent checks.