on
RE:
I would class this as a bug. As Dynamics 365 in general is supposed to be multilingual a feature is not "done" until it fully supports the standard multilingual capabilities.
RE:
We have the same request from our customer. They cannot wait to start staging until everything has been packed.
RE:
This is an important feature, I have a customer using Celum as a DAM. To make CI-J more enterprise friendly, this is an important feature. Start by just making it easy to handle from API:s and Power Automate. Then ISV:s and partners can start handling it.
RE:
This is very important for customers that want a centralized Digital asset management tool, like Celum. In these cases the Digital asset managment tool controls all images in all formats with tags etc. Being able to integrate the digital assets to CI-J is very important. I thought this was already there.
RE:
Strongly Agree as this is very common requirement to filter lookups based on prior field (either choice or Lookup) selection.
RE:
As feature parity between OBM and RTM this should be closed.
RE:
I strongly recommend this feature as marketing team is lost in selection of relevant fields for marketing campaign from whole lot of fields from lead/contact table. This was an ask from one of our client too but unfortunately it's system behaviour
RE:
Yes, this also needs to include a marketing campaign perspecive. We as a Microsoft partner have built this several times for customers. Not very complex but very useful to have. The old campaign-table from classic Dynamics CRM is a good start. With budgets, start/end, products, planning activities etc. Now it should be connected to the different journeys and should maybe be an orchestrator of journeys, segments etc.
RE:
I think this is important to be able to set limits on individual environments and also users so that budgets can be maintained.Larger installations often have multiple production instances for different regions/divisions and any help in maintaining a more complex setup is very useful from an enterprise perspective. Both from budgeting and reporting perspective. A common issue for larger setups is how much of the capacity and licensing costs are to be directed to the different environments. This is important if CI-J is to be enterprise ready.
RE:
Branding with set templates for all channels needs to be prioritized. I agree, both from a branding perspective but also from a time perspective. Anything that can save time for marketeers is good and increases the value of the platform for the end customer. I don't think the copilot based branding is good enough, although a good idea, but it needs to be more strictly fixed as Branding is often very stricty controlled from corporate guidelines.