on
RE:
I think two different scenarios need to be taken into consideration. B2B and B2C. I have B2C customers that choose CI-J despite its quite steep cost per contact. However, they do choose to build custom solutions with, for instance Send Grid, to avoid light touch contacts to become a marketing contact. As there is a cost per contact there is of course also a potential income per contact. If you map these two in a graph with the cost/income on the y-axis and the contacts sorted by greatest to lowest potential income on the right hand axis, you get sort of a long-tail-graph. Any contacts that are right of the intersection between these two graphs are not worth the cost. Where this is for any business, is of course based on the specifics of that business.
RE:
I agree. It is very useful to at least have a list of the fixes being released and when as we sometimes need to build workarounds for some bugs and when the fix is in place the workaround can be refactored to be a better solution.
RE:
I agree, more extensive custom link management is needed as that enables a lot of different things and allows the end users to be more creative. This should be linked to branded links/Vanity links feature.
RE:
This is a critical feature for many organizations especially if emails are being sent out with the link in the email. Or links are made from the top site and one wants to maintain trust with the customer. There are a lot of scams going on so using a certified domain is one way to mitigate this.
RE:
Katrina has raised this - Ability to Revalue the GL using Different FX rates - https://experience.dynamics.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=db7964f7-39a8-ef11-95f5-0022485288a6Please vote for this.
RE:
It would be a great feature and better design to have an option (checkbox) on the fields in the model driven apps form editor to display descriptions so it can be targeted, and not all or nothing.
RE:
I know this suggestion is 2.5+ years old but YES.We have many customers with multiple ship-to addresses and some of those customers want to see order confirmations, invoices, and credit memos sent to different recipients based on the ship-to address.At present, there is only one option, set at the customer level, for Document Layouts. For us, at least, it would be better if the entire Document Layouts page was tied to the Ship-to card vs. the Customer card.
RE:
Desperately needed.
RE:
This change could be a great benefit for information clarity.
RE:
Hi Kitty GeigerThank you for your response. However, I believe there may have been a misunderstanding regarding the requirement.I am looking to change the start date of the deferral, not the billing end date.Please review the scenario carefully:The billing schedule start date is 13th January 2024.I have enabled Rule-15 from the deferral parameters.Based on this rule, the deferral start date should be 1st January 2024, not 13th January 2024.When I attempt to manually set the deferral start date to 1st January 2024 on the billing schedule deferral form, I receive the following error:“Deferral start date should be greater than or equal to billing start date.”Please advise on how to handle this situation so that the deferral can start on 1st January 2024 as per the rule.