on
RE:
Timo wrote back in 2019: "As part of Norwegian features, user is able to define which company bank account is chosen depending on i.a Currency. Now, when generating payment proposal, this setup is considered which offset account is used on the payment journal line. But user is not able to generate one file to sent to the bank but must generate payment file per bank account."Why is this function only made for Norway? We are currenctly implementing companies in different countries in the same environment and have to find different processes due to the tables BankCustPaymModeBankAccounts and BankVendPaymModeBankAccounts not being available for all countries.
RE:
--- it is not allowed to post Links ---https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/business-central/dev-itpro/developer/properties/devenv-helplink-property
RE:
@Gnanendra Reddy,Thank you for the information.Could you please share the blog post link here since we couldn't find it.
RE:
Our business would find this feature is highly desirable as we have a requirement to enter large amounts of data into some tables on a periodic basis. The inline editable feature in a grid would streamline this process considerably making the data entry process much more efficient. The only workaround for this currently is to enter the data in an Excel file and bulk import which requires the user not to make any errors when populating the excel file and does not provide real time validation of the data.
RE:
We currently use zoom webinar for a number of events, so this functionality is vital for our business (recruitment office).
RE:
Great idea! This is the main reason we did not start using the new Statistical Account ledger and continue to use the regular General Ledger/Chart of Accounts for statistical data. This would solve a major gap in the functionality for businesses like ours that budget/forecast for statistical values in addition to financial values.
RE:
I don't understand why companies are being encouraged to adopt Planning Optimization while deprecating classic MRP, yet a vital process like Intercompany is being removed in the transition. This decision seems completely illogical! At the Dynamics Community conference, Microsoft speakers explicitly advised transitioning to Planning Optimization due to the deprecation of classic MRP, yet they failed to mention that this shift would come at the cost of losing Intercompany functionality. With over 20 facilities worldwide, my company heavily depends on Intercompany operations. We are embarking on the migration from on-prem to the cloud, believing that this move, along with Planning Optimization, would resolve our MRP performance issues. Now, we’re realizing it’s not that simple. Planning Optimization may work well, but only if Intercompany isn't part of the equation.If I am missing something or there are future plans within the Microsoft roadmap, then please let us know. My company must have Intercompany included in the functionality of Planning Optimization.
RE:
The same is in Project management/Projects/All Projects/Journals/Fee,Hour,Item,Expense.
RE:
Hello Jonathon Nelson,Has this feature been implemented?
RE:
Fully agree.